From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kliegman v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 1955
285 App. Div. 1064 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion

April 11, 1955.

Present — MacCrate, Acting P.J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.


Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the respondent, State Rent Administrator, which establishes at $57.50 the maximum rent of an apartment in a building owned by appellants. Appellants contend that the maximum rent is $69. The administrator found that the maximum rent on March 1, 1943, was $50, subsequently increased by approved leases to $57.50, and that no additional increase is warranted under the equalization adjustment provisions effective May 1, 1953. Appellants contend that the maximum rent on March 1, 1943, was $60, as appears in the registration certificate filed with the Federal rent office by the then owner of the premises, which certificate was signed by the tenant. The proof shows that on March 1, 1943, the premises were under a lease calling for $60 a month but that under another provision in the lease, and by virtue of a separate agreement in writing, the tenant was required to pay only $50 and in fact paid $50 at that time and for a continuous period of time extending beyond July 1, 1947. The appellants further contend that the administrator's determination is arbitrary because appellants were not given a personal hearing. Petitioners appeal from an order denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion.


Summaries of

Matter of Kliegman v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 1955
285 App. Div. 1064 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

Matter of Kliegman v. McGoldrick

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LOUIS KLIEGMAN et al., Appellants, against JOSEPH D…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 11, 1955

Citations

285 App. Div. 1064 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Citing Cases

Matter of N.C. Leasing v. N.Y. State Division

We hold that the determination of the respondent has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and…

Matter of David v. N.Y. City Conciliation

In Matter of La Barbera v Housing Dev. Auth. of City of N.Y. ( 44 A.D.2d 835), the Second Department upheld a…