From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Klag v. Drug & Chemical Club, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 14, 1953
114 N.E.2d 434 (N.Y. 1953)

Opinion

Argued May 28, 1953

Decided July 14, 1953

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Abraham Markhoff for appellant.

Herbert F. Hastings, Jr., and Florence G. Mann for Drug Chemical Club, Inc., and another, respondents.

Valentine A. Meehan, Leo D. Fitzgerald and Eugene T. O'Neill for Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, respondent.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( John J. Quinn, Wendell P. Brown and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.



Order of the Appellate Division reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, upon the dissenting memorandum in the Appellate Division, and matter remitted to the Workmen's Compensation Board for further proceedings in accordance with that memorandum. No opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, DESMOND, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. LEWIS, Ch. J., DYE and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.


Summaries of

Claim of Klag v. Drug & Chemical Club, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 14, 1953
114 N.E.2d 434 (N.Y. 1953)
Case details for

Claim of Klag v. Drug & Chemical Club, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of FRED C. KLAG, Appellant, against DRUG…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 14, 1953

Citations

114 N.E.2d 434 (N.Y. 1953)
114 N.E.2d 434

Citing Cases

Matter of Trageser v. State Insurance Fund

and that which appellant seeks to reach for reimbursement. Respondent board's brief correctly contends that…

Matter of Dickman v. City of New York

Although an employer is entitled to reimbursement for advance payments of compensation or payments in like…