From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of King v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 9, 1995
216 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 9, 1995

Appeal from the Oswego County Family Court, Auser, J.H.O.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Pine, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order of Family Court that set aside a custodial arrangement, established by agreement of the parties and incorporated in a court order. He contends that such arrangement "should be changed based only upon `"countervailing circumstances on consideration of the totality of circumstances"'" (Fox v. Fox, 177 A.D.2d 209, 210-211, quoting Friederwitzer v. Friederwitzer, 55 N.Y.2d 89, 95; see, Matter of Aylesworth v. Aylesworth, 207 A.D.2d 970). Although a preexisting custodial arrangement should be accorded great weight, Family Court was "in the most advantageous position to evaluate the testimony, character, and sincerity of the parties" (DeJesus v DeJesus, 208 A.D.2d 587, 588, citing Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167), and the court's determination should not be disturbed where, as here, it has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see, Matter of Gloria S. v. Richard B., 80 A.D.2d 72, 76).


Summaries of

Matter of King v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 9, 1995
216 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of King v. King

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVID C. KING, Appellant, v. CHRISTINE M. KING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
629 N.Y.S.2d 158

Citing Cases

Matter of Schimmel v. Schimmel

Memorandum: "The court's determination regarding custody * * *, based upon a first-hand assessment of the…

In the Matter of King v. King

It is hereby ordered that said appeal insofar as it concerns petitioner Matthew Warren King be and the same…