From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of King v. Correspondence Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 1982
89 A.D.2d 1043 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

September 23, 1982


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Levine, J.), entered October 9, 1981 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to compel respondent to accept certain letters written by petitioner for mailing. In the instant petition, petitioner contends that respondent improperly refused to mail certain letters he had written to three attorneys. However, petitioner failed to pursue the administrative remedy available to him under section 139 Correct. of the Correction Law. Due to this fact, Special Term dismissed the petition, without prejudice to renewal upon exhaustion of administrative remedies. Since petitioner failed even to allege that he has exhausted the available administrative remedy, Special Term's judgment must be affirmed (see Matter of Patterson v Smith, 53 N.Y.2d 98). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Sweeney, Kane, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of King v. Correspondence Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 1982
89 A.D.2d 1043 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of King v. Correspondence Department

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GEORGE KING, Appellant, v. CORRESPONDENCE DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 23, 1982

Citations

89 A.D.2d 1043 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Matter of Konigsberg v. Coughlin

Therefore, while it may ultimately be established that petitioner is entitled to all or some of the relief…