From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kincade v. Barristers Tavern Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1992
187 A.D.2d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 16, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Since the petitioner permitted years to elapse before registering an objection to the manner in which the corporation authorized the issuance of certain shares of stock, he is estopped from arguing that the issuance was improper (cf., Block v Magee, 146 A.D.2d 730, 733; see, Business Corporations Law § 622 [e] [5]). In any event, we reject the petitioner's contention that the stock issuance, which was approved by a majority vote of the outstanding shares, was void because a majority of the corporation's directors did not also approve the measure. The corporation's certificate of incorporation contains no requirement that the issuance of stock be approved by a vote of the board of directors. Further, the cases relied upon by the petitioner are factually and legally inapposite (see, e.g., Matter of Tabulating Card Co. v Leidesdorf, 32 Misc.2d 720). Thompson, J.P., Eiber, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Kincade v. Barristers Tavern Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1992
187 A.D.2d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Kincade v. Barristers Tavern Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM J. KINCADE, Appellant, v. BARRISTERS TAVERN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Heisler v. Gingras

Viewing the record as a whole, we find the evidence sufficient to establish that respondents acquiesced in…