From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kinahan v. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Cos.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1976
52 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

May 3, 1976


In a proceeding inter alia to stay arbitration, Aetna Life and Casualty Co., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 20, 1975, which (1) granted the application and (2) ordered it "to defend and cover Tedesco for the accident". Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The FS20 sent by appellant evidenced the issuance of a policy for the period involved. The attempted cancellation of this policy by appellant was ineffective because its notice of termination was insufficient under the terms of subdivision 1 of section 313 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Furthermore, from the record herein, it appears that appellant failed to notify the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the termination by cancellation, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 313 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Accordingly, therefore, appellant remained liable and obligated to defend its insured (see Capra v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 31 N.Y.2d 760). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Kinahan v. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Cos.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1976
52 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Kinahan v. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Cos.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES E. KINAHAN, Respondent, v. FIREMAN'S FUND AMERICAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 1976

Citations

52 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)