From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Keough v. Rothman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 30, 1989
153 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Summary

holding that trial court did not commit an abuse of discretion in admitting "undeniably gruesome black and white photographs depicting [a homicide victim] after the attack and during the autopsy"

Summary of this case from Reyes v. Ercole

Opinion

August 30, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see, Election Law § 16-116; Matter of Bruno v Ackerson, 51 A.D.2d 1051, affd 39 N.Y.2d 718). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Keough v. Rothman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 30, 1989
153 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

holding that trial court did not commit an abuse of discretion in admitting "undeniably gruesome black and white photographs depicting [a homicide victim] after the attack and during the autopsy"

Summary of this case from Reyes v. Ercole
Case details for

Matter of Keough v. Rothman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES P. KEOUGH, Appellant, v. ETHEL A. ROTHMAN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 30, 1989

Citations

153 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
544 N.Y.S.2d 889

Citing Cases

Reyes v. Ercole

"); People v. Hayes, 897 N.Y.S.2d 370, 371 (App. Div. 2010) ("The photographs were properly admitted in…

People v. Saunders

First, People's exhibit No. 147, a photograph of victim A's post-surgery elbow wound, was relevant and…