Opinion
May 15, 1989
Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Pearce, J.).
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The radio report of a dispute involving a gun at the location in question, coupled with the responding officer's observations when he arrived at that location, provided reasonable suspicion justifying the pat down (see, People v Benjamin, 51 N.Y.2d 267; People v De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210). Thus, the fact-finding court properly denied suppression of the gun seized from the defendant as a result of the pat down. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.