From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kennedy v. Macaluso

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 6, 1982
435 N.E.2d 1094 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided April 6, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, J. ROBERT LYNCH, J.

William J. McClusky for appellant.

Terrence J. Whelan for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. An attorney has no retaining lien on an executed but unfiled divorce decree (see Matter of Bergstrom Co., 131 App. Div. 791; Matter of Reiss, 200 Misc. 697) and may be compelled, via a CPLR article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus, to file such decree.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Matter of Kennedy v. Macaluso

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 6, 1982
435 N.E.2d 1094 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Kennedy v. Macaluso

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KAREN KENNEDY, Respondent, v. CARMEN J. MACALUSO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 6, 1982

Citations

435 N.E.2d 1094 (N.Y. 1982)
435 N.E.2d 1094
450 N.Y.S.2d 479

Citing Cases

People v. Owens

As officers of the Court, both the District Attorney and defense counsel have an obligation to notify the…

People v. Owens

As officers of the court, both the District Attorney and defense counsel have an obligation to notify the…