From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kelly v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 22, 1993
192 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion


192 A.D.2d 897 597 N.Y.S.2d 198 In the Matter of Courtney KELLY, Petitioner, v. Thomas A. COUGHLIN III, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents. Supreme Court of New York, Third Department April 22, 1993.

        Courtney Kelly, in pro. per.

        Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. (Martin A. Hotvet, of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

        Before MIKOLL, J.P., and YESAWICH, MERCURE and CREW, JJ.

         MEMORANDUM DECISION.

        Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

        Petitioner was charged with violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting assault, possession of a weapon and disobeyance of a direct order. The misbehavior report stated that petitioner, after being ordered to lock in, ran over to another inmate and cut him with a "razorblade type weapon". At the hearing the correction officer who had authored the report testified, confirming the information in the report and stating that he saw petitioner attack the inmate with what appeared to be a razor blade. The report and the confirmatory testimony by the correction officer who authored it provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Bernacet v. Coughlin, 145 A.D.2d 802, 535 N.Y.S.2d 785, lv. denied, 74 N.Y.2d 603, 542 N.Y.S.2d 518, 540 N.E.2d 713).

        The victim of the assault was called as a witness by petitioner but signed a form indicating that he did not want to be involved because petitioner "cut" him. Petitioner contends that the Hearing Officer erred in failing to make further inquiry as to why the victim would not testify. We find that petitioner waived any objection to the procedure followed by the Hearing Officer by failing to insist that the victim be called to testify or that further inquiry be made at the hearing (see, Matter of Dixon v. Coughlin, 178 A.D.2d 984, 578 N.Y.S.2d 757; Matter of Lebron v. Coughlin, 169 A.D.2d 859, 564 N.Y.S.2d 587, lv. denied, 78 N.Y.2d 852, 573 N.Y.S.2d 465, 577 N.E.2d 1057; Matter of Crowley v. O'Keefe, 148 A.D.2d 816, 538 N.Y.S.2d 652, lv. denied, 74 N.Y.2d 613, 547 N.Y.S.2d 847, 547 N.E.2d 102; cf., Matter of Codrington v. Mann, 174 A.D.2d 868, 571 N.Y.S.2d 160).

        ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Summaries of

Matter of Kelly v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 22, 1993
192 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Kelly v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of COURTNEY KELLY, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1993

Citations

192 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
597 N.Y.S.2d 198
597 N.Y.S.2d 1198

Citing Cases

Matter of Pacheco v. Dufrain

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit…

Matter of Howell v. Goord

We would first note that it appears from the record that petitioner was furnished with a copy of this report…