From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Keenholts v. Bayer Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 1933
263 N.Y. 77 (N.Y. 1933)

Opinion

Argued October 3, 1933

Decided November 21, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

F.A.W. Ireland for appellants.

Ransom H. Gillett for claimant, respondent.


Upon appeal to the Appellate Division the parties stipulated "That the issue on this appeal is whether a schedule award under Par. (E), Sub-div. 3 of Sec. 15, W.C.L., made for the loss of claimant's left eye is payable to the widow of the deceased claimant in addition to the death benefits provided for in Sec. 16, W.C.L., where death resulted from the injuries."

The Appellate Division apparently accepted the statement of the stipulation that the award had in fact been made, and held that it was payable to the widow in addition to death benefits. The parties have taken this to mean that when the schedule award was made there was a vested right to full payment for one hundred and sixty weeks, which right passed in full to the widow upon the death of claimant. The contention of the appellants here is that where death results from the injury the widow is entitled, in addition to death benefits, only to the compensation due at the time of the death.

We take the case as it comes to us under the stipulation and hold upon the authorities cited by the Appellate Division (Workmen's Compensation Law; Cons. Laws, ch. 67, § 33; Matter of Sienko v. Bopp Morgenstern, 248 N.Y. 40; Matter of Hughes v. St. Patrick's Cathedral, 245 N.Y. 201) that the contention of the appellants is right. Assuming that a schedule award was made during the lifetime of the claimant, upon the death of the claimant, resulting from the injuries, the award was supplanted by the death benefits and all the widow could claim was the portion, if any, of the award unpaid down to the time of claimant's death.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the claim remitted to the State Industrial Board for an award in accordance with this opinion and upon the facts as they may exist, without costs.

POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Keenholts v. Bayer Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 1933
263 N.Y. 77 (N.Y. 1933)
Case details for

Matter of Keenholts v. Bayer Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MAY A. KEENHOLTS, Respondent, against THE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 21, 1933

Citations

263 N.Y. 77 (N.Y. 1933)
188 N.E. 163

Citing Cases

Zechmann v. Canisteo Fire

The first question we must answer, then, is whether a claim for benefits arising from a death causally…

Youngjohn v. Berry Plastics Corp.

In other words, under section 15(4), when the workplace injury has not caused the claimant's death, payment…