From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Keefe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 18, 1975
50 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

December 18, 1975


Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 22, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining, as modified, the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective December 31, 1974 because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The sufficiency of cause for leaving employment raises a factual issue for the board to resolve and its determination thereof, if supported by substantial evidence, will not be disturbed (Matter of Lubin [Catherwood], 34 A.D.2d 591; Matter of Weber [Catherwood], 32 A.D.2d 697). Here, claimant agreed to perform additional work but left because he was dissatisfied with the amount of additional compensation offered for this work. Dissatisfaction with wages does not constitute good cause for leaving employment and we cannot say that this record fails to contain substantial evidence from which the board could properly conclude that it was this dissatisfaction, rather than some other reason, which led to claimant's resignation (cf. Matter of Latona [Levine], 50 A.D.2d 957). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J.P., Kane, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Keefe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 18, 1975
50 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Matter of Keefe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOSEPH KEEFE, Appellant. LOUIS L. LEVINE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 18, 1975

Citations

50 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Matter of Utley

The employer testified that operating the machine was part of the claimant's job and that stock girls and…

Matter of Phillips

As to the substantial evidence questions, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the Board's…