Summary
In Matter of Karp v. Hults (9 N.Y.2d 857), the court affirmed a finding that petitioner "by his failure to observe this object in front of him and by his failure to use the unused portion of the highway to avoid striking the rear of the vehicle in front of him" showed "a reckless disregard for life and property of others".
Summary of this case from Pask v. HultsOpinion
Argued March 27, 1961
Decided April 20, 1961
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.
George H. Rosen for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Philip J. Fitzgerald and Paxton Blair of counsel), for respondent.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.