From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kaplan v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 29, 1951
279 App. Div. 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

October 29, 1951.


In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator vacating and setting aside an order of eviction issued by the local rent administrator, final order granting respondents' petition and directing the State Rent Administrator to issue a certificate of eviction in favor of respondents and against the tenant of an apartment in respondents' two-family house, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and petition dismissed, without costs. In our opinion this record establishes that there was substantial evidence before the State Rent Administrator warranting his finding that the landlords did not seek in good faith to recover possession of the housing accommodations; that such finding is a reasonable basis for his determination, and the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the State Rent Administrator. (L. 1946, ch. 274, § 5, subd. 2, par. [a] as amd. by L. 1951, ch. 443; Matter of Mounting Finishing Co. v. McGoldrick, 294 N.Y. 104, 108; Matter of Park East Land Corp. v. Finkelstein, 299 N.Y. 70, 75.) Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Kaplan v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 29, 1951
279 App. Div. 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Matter of Kaplan v. McGoldrick

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SAMUEL KAPLAN et al., Respondents, against JOSEPH D…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Matter of Venizelos v. Abrams

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. A question of fact with respect to good faith was presented for…

Matter of Seaside Developments v. McGoldrick

In the circumstances, the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the administrator. ( Matter of…