From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Jones v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 31, 1986
125 A.D.2d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

December 31, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


Petitioner, an inmate at Clinton County Correctional Facility, was served with a misbehavior report charging him with a violation of institutional rule 113.12 based upon his alleged possession of marihuana. He was determined to be guilty after a Superintendent's proceeding and a penalty of 60 days' keeplock and two months' loss of good time and other privileges was imposed. Following adverse administrative review, petitioner commenced the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding by notice of motion returnable at Supreme Court on January 31, 1986. Supreme Court subsequently transferred the proceeding to this court.

Petitioner now contends that respondents failed to timely interpose an answer to his petition five days prior to the January 31 return date and therefore may not oppose his petition here. This claim is unavailing. The record establishes that on January 31 Supreme Court granted an adjournment of this matter to February 21. Thus, respondents were required to serve answering papers by February 16, 1986 (see, CPLR 7804 [c]; Matter of Narcotic Parole Officers Assn. v. Bahou, 88 Misc.2d 909, 910). Since February 16 was a Sunday, and the following day was a national holiday, respondents' service of answering papers on February 18 was timely (see, General Construction Law § 25-a).

Petitioner's assertion that the disposition at the Superintendent's proceeding was not supported by substantial evidence is without merit. The sole basis for this claim is the Hearing Officer's failure to honor petitioner's request that either the contraband or a picture of it be introduced into evidence. The officers testified, however, to observing another inmate hand petitioner two cigarettes, to frisking petitioner and finding the two cigarettes in his pants pocket, and to testing the cigarettes positively for marihuana. This testimony was more than sufficient to sustain the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Smith v. Coughlin, 111 A.D.2d 503, 505).

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Main, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Jones v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 31, 1986
125 A.D.2d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of Jones v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MILTON JONES, Petitioner, v. THOMAS COUGHLIN, III, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1986

Citations

125 A.D.2d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Sinclair v. Annucci

Accordingly, under these circumstances, we discern no basis upon which to overturn the denial of petitioner's…

Nelson v. Fischer

The return date was Friday, August 5,2011. Inasmuch as July 31,2011 was a Sunday, respondent was afforded…