From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Johnson v. Pritchard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1998
248 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 30, 1998


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determination of the respondents was supported by substantial evidence ( see, CPLR 7803; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 181). Moreover, the penalty of dismissal imposed was not so disproportionate to the offenses committed as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness ( see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233), especially in light of the petitioner's failure to correct his behavior after prior reprimands and suspensions ( see, Matter of Short v. Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn., 45 N.Y.2d 721; Matter of Tinney v. Schneider, 216 A.D.2d 474).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

Joy, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Johnson v. Pritchard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1998
248 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Johnson v. Pritchard

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RONALD JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. JOHN PRITCHARD et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 277

Citing Cases

Thomas v. City of Mount Vernon Department of Public Safety

The penalty of dismissal was not "so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all the circumstances,…