From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Jessup v. D'Elia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 13, 1986
116 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

January 13, 1986


Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Petitioner's application on behalf of her minor son Corey for public assistance in the category of Aid to Dependent Children was denied by the local agency on the basis that petitioner owned an automobile valued in excess of $1,500, the statutory resource limit (see, 42 U.S.C. § 602 [a] [7] [B]; 45 C.F.R. § 233.20 [a] [3] [i] [B]; 18 NYCRR 352.23 [b] [2]).

At a fair hearing conducted at petitioner's request to review the determination of the local agency, petitioner did not contest the agency's determination regarding the value of the car. In addition, evidence was adduced which indicated that (1) petitioner was the registered owner of the car as well as the holder of the certificate of title thereto, and (2) petitioner regularly drove the car and parked it in her building's parking lot. After the fair hearing, the respondent State Commissioner affirmed the local agency's determination on the ground that the car was an available resource which could be used for her minor child's support because "the holder of the Certificate of Title in New York State controls the sale or disposition of the automobile and is the owner thereof".

In determining the extent of the family's resources for the purpose of deciding eligibility for a grant of Aid to Dependent Children, only those resources which are "immediately or potentially available" to the applicant shall be considered ( 18 NYCRR 351.2 [e] [1]; Matter of Flynn v Bates, 67 A.D.2d 975).

Moreover, it has been consistently held that there is a rebuttable presumption that true ownership is in the registered owner of a vehicle or the one holding the documents of title (Young v Seckler, 74 A.D.2d 155; Fulater v Palmer's Granite Garage, 90 A.D.2d 685, appeal dismissed 58 N.Y.2d 826). A review of the instant record indicates that petitioner failed to rebut this presumption. Accordingly, the respondent State Commissioner's determination was supported by substantial evidence and is confirmed. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Jessup v. D'Elia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 13, 1986
116 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of Jessup v. D'Elia

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANNIE JESSUP, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH D'ELIA, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 13, 1986

Citations

116 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Matter of Jessup v. D'Elia

Decided March 19, 1987 Appeal from (2d dept: 116 A.D.2d 578; 121 A.D.2d 541) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL…

Matter of Jessup v. D'Elia

Decided November 13, 1986 Appeal from (2d dept: 116 A.D.2d 578) APPEALS ON CONSTITUTIONAL…