From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ingram v. Mann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 7, 1995
219 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

September 7, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ulster County.


As the result of an incident in which petitioner failed to terminate a telephone call and return to his cell before it was locked, petitioner was found guilty of being out of place and violating count procedures. He contends that the determination of guilt is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. We disagree. The evidence against petitioner consisted of a misbehavior report authored by a correction officer who witnessed the incident. This, coupled with petitioner's admission that he did not arrive at his cell until after the doors had been locked, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the determination. We have considered petitioner's other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Ingram v. Mann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 7, 1995
219 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Ingram v. Mann

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MAURICE INGRAM, Petitioner, v. LOUIS MANN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 7, 1995

Citations

219 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
631 N.Y.S.2d 191

Citing Cases

Matter of Bettis v. Dufrain

In each instance, petitioner's description of the incidents which gave rise to the charged disciplinary…

Matter of Abdul-Matiyn v. Commissioner

However, since the matter is now before us, we may decide the issue as if it had been properly transferred…