From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Indus. Commr. v. Underwood Elliott Fisher Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 5, 1936
3 N.E.2d 462 (N.Y. 1936)

Opinion

Argued May 20, 1936

Decided June 5, 1936

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Frank L. Ward for appellants.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ. Dissenting: LEHMAN, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Indus. Commr. v. Underwood Elliott Fisher Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 5, 1936
3 N.E.2d 462 (N.Y. 1936)
Case details for

Matter of Indus. Commr. v. Underwood Elliott Fisher Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of the INDUSTRIAL COMMISSIONER, Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 5, 1936

Citations

3 N.E.2d 462 (N.Y. 1936)
3 N.E.2d 462

Citing Cases

Mtr. of Dept. of Tax. Fin. v. Thompson-Starrett

The settlement aforesaid was without the consent of the carrier. The award in question, made upon the finding…

Matter of Grasso

However, Royal's additional payments of $500 and $1,500 were not payments of compensation or benefits…