From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hylan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 29, 1934
242 App. Div. 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

October 29, 1934.

Appeal from Supreme Court of Albany County.

Harry A. Gordon, Eric C. Gordon, Charles Norman Shaffer and Gustave W.M. Wieboldt, for the appellants.

Robert E. Whalen and John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General [ Henry Epstein, Solicitor-General; Charles J. Duncan, David A. White, Anthony De Stefano, Edward S. Rooney, George W. Foy, George Myers and Moses L. Kove of counsel], for the respondents.


RHODES, McNAMEE, CRAPSER and BLISS, JJ., concur; HILL, P.J., dissents and votes to reverse the orders upon the ground that the court should have directed the objectors to furnish the proponents of the nominating petition with a bill of particulars to permit preparation for the trial; and upon the further ground that illegal evidence was received and considered by the court. The witness Finn, election commissioner of Clinton county, was not the legal custodian of the registry lists between the completion thereof and election day. (Election Law, § 181.)

Twenty-four thousand electors of New York State have attempted to place a ticket in nomination. Their expressed desires should not be thwarted upon technical grounds.

Orders affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Hylan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 29, 1934
242 App. Div. 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Matter of Hylan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Petition Purporting to Nominate JOHN F. HYLAN for…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1934

Citations

242 App. Div. 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
275 N.Y.S. 522

Citing Cases

Hunt v. Superior Court

A qualified elector is one who has complied with the election laws, and who is registered as a voter at the…