From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Humphrey v. Tietjen Steffin Milk Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1933
185 N.E. 733 (N.Y. 1933)

Opinion

Argued January 10, 1933

Decided January 24, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Robert E. Dineen for appellants.

R.S. Johnson and Smith Johnson for respondent.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General, for State Industrial Board, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, and questions certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Humphrey v. Tietjen Steffin Milk Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1933
185 N.E. 733 (N.Y. 1933)
Case details for

Matter of Humphrey v. Tietjen Steffin Milk Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of HOWARD HUMPHREY, Respondent, against TIETJEN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 24, 1933

Citations

185 N.E. 733 (N.Y. 1933)
185 N.E. 733

Citing Cases

Matter of Ramos v. Taxi Tr. Co.

And it has been held by this court that where it is found that the injury was sustained in the course of…

Rice v. Revere Copper Brass, Inc.

Apparently the court found that the injury was a natural result of association in the work, or at all events…