From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hudson Watch Assoc. v. H.F.S. Elec

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1987
134 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

November 9, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On motions to stay or to compel arbitration there are three threshold questions to be resolved by the courts: whether the parties made a valid agreement to arbitrate, whether if such an agreement was made it has been complied with, and whether the claim sought to be arbitrated would be barred by limitation of time had it been asserted in a court of the State (Matter of County of Rockland [Primiano Constr. Co.], 51 N.Y.2d 1, 6-7).

Under the circumstances of the instant case we find that the Supreme Court properly granted the application to stay arbitration pending a judicial determination on the limited issue of whether there exists a valid agreement to arbitrate. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Hudson Watch Assoc. v. H.F.S. Elec

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1987
134 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Hudson Watch Assoc. v. H.F.S. Elec

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HUDSON WATCH ASSOCIATES, Respondent, v. H.F.S…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Matter of County of Dutchess

Contrary to the appellant's contentions, the Supreme Court properly entertained the petitioner's application…

Chanry Communications v. Circulation Mgmt

The petitioners Chanry Communications, Ltd. (hereafter Chanry) and Pennysaver Home Distribution Corporation…