From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Horn v. Pals & Solow

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 14, 1949
86 N.E.2d 103 (N.Y. 1949)

Opinion

Submitted March 2, 1949

Decided April 14, 1949

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Bernard Katzen, General Attorney ( George J. Hayes and Victor Fiddler of counsel), for State Insurance Fund and another, appellants.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Daniel Polansky and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.


Order reversed and claim dismissed upon the ground that there was no evidence of an accidental injury within the meaning of subdivision 7 of section 2 of the Workmen's Compensation Law. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and BROMLEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Claim of Horn v. Pals & Solow

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 14, 1949
86 N.E.2d 103 (N.Y. 1949)
Case details for

Claim of Horn v. Pals & Solow

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of FLORENCE HORN, Respondent, against PALS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 14, 1949

Citations

86 N.E.2d 103 (N.Y. 1949)
86 N.E.2d 103

Citing Cases

Matter of Greensmith v. Franklin Bank

A resulting cold would present itself as a disease and not as an accident." This position has been reaffirmed…

Claim of Foley v. Rensselaer County Department of Health

There is no evidence of any factual basis showing a catastrophic emergent exposure. The board's finding that…