From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Horan v. Frangella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 10, 1969
32 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

June 10, 1969


MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The petition for opportunity to ballot was properly rejected by Special Term on account of the insufficiency of the authenticating statements. A statement of the present address of the subscribing witness, as well as the date and place of last registration, is required ( Matter of Lerner v. Cohen, 262 N.Y. 450; Matter of Dorsey v. Cohen, 268 N.Y. 620; Matter of Crosbie v. Cohen, 281 N.Y. 329). Application for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.


Summaries of

Matter of Horan v. Frangella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 10, 1969
32 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Matter of Horan v. Frangella

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PETER J. HORAN, JR., Respondent, v. JOSEPH C. FRANGELLA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 10, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
300 N.Y.S.2d 791

Citing Cases

MATTER OF SIWEK v. VAN WART

In my opinion, the fact that the petitioner himself served the order to show cause on some of the respondents…

Matter of Ashley v. Lomenzo

We concur with the trial court's finding that one of the pages of the petition was not authenticated in…