From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hopfl

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 29, 1979
400 N.E.2d 292 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Argued November 14, 1979

Decided November 29, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department.

Andrew M. Lawler, Jr., Elliot L. Evans and Dennis E. Milton for appellant.

Nicholas C. Cooper and Michael Alan Schwartz for Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. Subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law mandates automatic disbarment upon conviction of a felony. It is clear that under this section as construed prior to its recent amendment (L 1979, ch 674), an attorney ceases to be a member of the Bar when convicted of a Federal felony, even one that has no New York analogue (Matter of Thies, 45 N.Y.2d 865; Matter of Chu, 42 N.Y.2d 490). Thus, upon his conviction under section 645 of title 15 of the United States Code, a felony under Federal law, appellant was automatically disbarred and it was proper for the Appellate Division at that time to strike his name from the roll of attorneys. The statutory sanction was rendered no less operative because the plea had been entered pursuant to North Carolina v Alford ( 400 U.S. 25). Although appellant did not admit his guilt, nonetheless he stood convicted of a felony.

In light of this disposition, it is unnecessary to determine whether the Federal offense has a New York counterpart and thus, we do not pass on that question which appropriately should be left to the Appellate Division to consider anew upon proper application. Although the recent amendment to section 90 does not apply on this appeal, we note that appellant, if so advised, is free to make application to the Appellate Division for any relief that may be available.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Hopfl

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 29, 1979
400 N.E.2d 292 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

Matter of Hopfl

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHARLES E. HOPFL, an Attorney, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 29, 1979

Citations

400 N.E.2d 292 (N.Y. 1979)
400 N.E.2d 292
424 N.Y.S.2d 350

Citing Cases

People v. Miller

Similar reasoning was employed in People v Friedman ( 39 N.Y.2d 463, supra), a case in which this Court…

Matter of Silmon v. Travis

We reverse. It is well settled that the Parole Board's determinations are discretionary, and if made in…