From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hollis v. Marriott Hotel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 15, 1994
210 A.D.2d 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 15, 1994

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Board.


Claimant suffered a compensable injury while working for the employer and subsequently did not report for work while she was convalescing. Testimony established that the employer was unable to contact claimant due to her failure to inform the employer of her new address. After receiving no answer from claimant to correspondence sent by the employer concerning her return to work, her employment was terminated. At the time of her termination, claimant was unable to perform her usual work duties. We find that these facts constitute substantial evidence to support the Board's determination that there was no evidence of discrimination within the meaning of Workers' Compensation Law § 120.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Hollis v. Marriott Hotel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 15, 1994
210 A.D.2d 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Hollis v. Marriott Hotel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of LINDA HOLLIS, Appellant, v. MARRIOTT HOTEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
620 N.Y.S.2d 174

Citing Cases

Matter of Dennis v. County Limousine Service

Claimant appeals. Upon our limited power to review the sufficiency of the evidence (see, Matter of Hollis v.…