From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hilton v. Truss Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1982
56 N.Y.2d 877 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Argued May 12, 1982

Decided June 10, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Samuel B. Varonese for appellants.

John S. Hogg for Gerald A. Hilton, respondent.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General, for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice PAUL J. YESAWICH, JR., at the Appellate Division ( 82 A.D.2d 711).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Matter of Hilton v. Truss Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1982
56 N.Y.2d 877 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Hilton v. Truss Systems, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of GERALD A. HILTON, Respondent, v. TRUSS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 10, 1982

Citations

56 N.Y.2d 877 (N.Y. 1982)
453 N.Y.S.2d 428
438 N.E.2d 1143

Citing Cases

Stenson v. New York State Department of Transportation

r] adequately preserved its right to a future offset is a factual issue for the Board" ( Matter of Brisson v…

Richter v. Ramistain Systems

The employer and the carrier now appeal, and we affirm. Pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 29 (4), when…