From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Heslin v. City of Cohoes

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 12, 1981
423 N.E.2d 53 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued April 27, 1981

Decided May 12, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, JOHN H. PENNOCK, J.

Richard R. Rowley and Paul J. Campito for appellant.

Jean Mary Reinhardt, Corporation Counsel, for respondent.



MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the motion to confirm the arbitration award granted for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Justice HERLIHY of that court.

In addition, we would emphasize that the appointment to be made in furtherance of the arbitration award is provisional in nature, and in no way binds the municipality to select a permanent appointee to the position from a statutorily inadequate list (Civil Service Law, § 61, subd 1). Therefore, the award cannot be said to violate public policy (see Matter of Sprinzen [ Nomberg], 46 N.Y.2d 623).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and the motion to confirm the arbitration award granted in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Heslin v. City of Cohoes

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 12, 1981
423 N.E.2d 53 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

Matter of Heslin v. City of Cohoes

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM HESLIN, as President of the Cohoes Police…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 12, 1981

Citations

423 N.E.2d 53 (N.Y. 1981)
423 N.E.2d 53
440 N.Y.S.2d 630

Citing Cases

Employees Assn

However, the questioned appointments are probationary for a period of 60 days under rule 17 of the Rules for…

Matter of Ruggeri v. Hall

Respondents do contend that Special Term was without authority to order them to make an appointment to the…