From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Heron v. Albany Law Sch. of Un. Univ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 21, 1977
57 A.D.2d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

April 21, 1977


Proceeding, initiated in this court pursuant to section 298 Exec. of the Executive Law, to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated January 3, 1977, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioner's complaint against Albany Law School. Petitioner, an unsuccessful applicant for a part-time, temporary, supervisory position in the library of Albany Law School, complained to the New York State Division of Human Rights that she was refused such employment because of her age and sex. A detailed investigation of her complaint was conducted by the division which resulted in a determination and order that there was no probable cause to believe Albany Law School had engaged in or was engaging in an unlawful discriminatory practice. That order was affirmed on appeal to the State Human Rights Appeal Board, and petitioner initiated this proceeding contending there is no substantial evidence to support the board's determination. Although it is clear that Albany Law School desired an employee older than its average student, there is no merit to the assertion that it limited consideration to those over 40 years of age. The source of petitioner's argument concerning this supposed age requirement was a job order drafted by the Labor Department, rather than from any definitive position taken by the employer. We would further note that the person actually hired is 31 years of age, that his coemployees range in age from 22 to 34 years, and that 12 of his 21 coemployees are female. We find nothing to suggest that the order of the division dismissing her complaint was arbitrary or capricious or in any other manner in violation of clearly established standards (Executive Law, § 297-a, subd 7, par e; Matter of Mize v State Div. of Human Rights, 33 N.Y.2d 53). Sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole clearly supports the board's order upholding the finding of no probable cause and, therefore, we must affirm it (State Div. of Human Rights v Stone Webster Engr. Corp., 52 A.D.2d 1088; State Div. of Human Rights v Xerox Corp., 49 A.D.2d 21, affd 39 N.Y.2d 873; Matter of Jwayyed v New York Tel. Co., 42 A.D.2d 663). Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Heron v. Albany Law Sch. of Un. Univ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 21, 1977
57 A.D.2d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Matter of Heron v. Albany Law Sch. of Un. Univ

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CAROL E. HERON, Petitioner, v. ALBANY LAW SCHOOL OF UNION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 21, 1977

Citations

57 A.D.2d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Powell v. New York State Div. of Human Rights

The motion papers indicate that petitioner failed to properly commence this proceeding by the filing and…

Mohawk Finishing Products, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human Rights

The finding of personal discrimination against the claimant by the appeal board in violation of this section…