Opinion
Submitted June 16, 1999
October 4, 1999
In a proceeding pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 29 Work. Comp.(5) to approve the settlement of an action nunc pro tunc, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.).
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Proceedings pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 29 Work. Comp.(5) are directed to the discretion of the court ( see, Matter of Gilson v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 246 A.D.2d 897; Severino v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 238 A.D.2d 837). The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in declining to approve the petitioner's settlement with a third party nunc pro tunc ( see, Matter of Gilson v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., supra; Matter of Wilbur v. Utica Mut. Co., 228 A.D.2d 928).
BRACKEN, J.P., THOMPSON, GOLDSTEIN, McGINITY, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.