From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hendricks v. Franklin Corr. Fac

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 30, 1998
249 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 30, 1998


Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from engaging in violent conduct and creating a disturbance. Petitioner's challenge to that determination in the context of this CPLR article 78 proceeding is, however, precluded by his failure to exhaust the available administrative remedies, there being no record that petitioner ever filed an administrative appeal ( see, 7 NYCRR 5.52; see also, Matter of Epps v. Broaddus, 236 A.D.2d 725; Matter of Pickett v. Long, 229 A.D.2d 802).

Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Hendricks v. Franklin Corr. Fac

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 30, 1998
249 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Hendricks v. Franklin Corr. Fac

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN HENDRICKS, Petitioner, v. FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 30, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 824

Citing Cases

Tafari v. McGinnis

We affirm. Judicial review of the administrative decisions rendered by the Hearing Officer is precluded by…

Richard Sunday v. Fischer

Initially, we note that the Attorney General has advised this Court that the September 3, 2008 disciplinary…