From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hayes v. Lomenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 20, 1966
26 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

June 20, 1966


MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT. Special Term did not have jurisdiction inasmuch as service on the parties other than the Secretary of State was attempted to be made by mailing copies of the order to show cause and supporting papers on or before 11:00 P.M. on June 8, 1966, the last day for service (Election Law § 314, subd. 12, as amd. by L. 1966, ch. 106, eff. March 31, 1966). To effect proper service, it was necessary that the papers be received on June 8th ( Matter of King v. Cohen, 293 N.Y. 435; Matter of Ullman Power, 36 Misc.2d 1015, affd. 17 A.D.2d 792, affd. 12 N.Y.2d 724). The proof of mailing does raise the presumption that the mail was received, as Special Term held; but there is no presumption that it was received on a particular date, in this case June 8. With this hiatus in the proof, petitioner Hayes did not submit, at Special Term or in this court, any return receipt evidencing delivery on June 8th. Special Term took no proof and the grounds of invalidity of the designating petition which it found, assuming arguendo that they were properly before it (but cf. Election Law, § 145), cannot be sustained. Petitioner Hayes' objection to the court's consideration of an affidavit and Zip Code Directory sustained. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and petition dismissed, without costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Hayes v. Lomenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 20, 1966
26 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Matter of Hayes v. Lomenzo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES H. HAYES, Respondent, v. JOHN P. LOMENZO, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 20, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

People v. Rakity

" (See, also, Hobart-Farrell Plumbing Heating Co. v. Klayman, 302 Mass. 605, and cases cited therein;…

Matter of Kordal v. Niesley

Moreover, the commission produced no record of the distribution, nor did it produce any witness with personal…