From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Haviland v. Haviland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 15, 1995
216 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 15, 1995

Appeal from the Family Court of Albany County (Tobin, J.).


In March 1989, petitioner and respondent separated and petitioner subsequently agreed to pay respondent $250 a week in spousal support. In May 1992, petitioner applied to Family Court seeking to eliminate his support obligation or in the alternative to have it reduced. Petitioner cited increased living expenses as the circumstance justifying a modification of the support commitment. After a hearing, a Hearing Examiner rejected petitioner's arguments and dismissed the application. Upon petitioner's filing of objections, Family Court sustained the Hearing Examiner's decision, resulting in this appeal by petitioner.

In our view, Family Court properly refused to modify or eliminate petitioner's support obligations based upon a claimed substantial change in circumstances ( see, Kavanagh v. Kavanagh, 119 A.D.2d 984; see also, Neumark v. Neumark, 189 A.D.2d 863, lv dismissed 82 N.Y.2d 843). A review of the record supports the conclusion that petitioner's professed increased living expenses were discretionary. In addition, the record does not demonstrate that respondent's increase in earnings since 1989 has resulted in a change in circumstances so as to warrant a modification ( see, Kavanagh v. Kavanagh, supra; see also, Polite v. Polite, 127 A.D.2d 465). We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and have rejected them as lacking in merit.

Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Haviland v. Haviland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 15, 1995
216 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Haviland v. Haviland

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN HAVILAND, Appellant, v. PHYLLIS HAVILAND, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 854

Citing Cases

Wight v. Wight

Defendant, on the other hand, owns no real estate, earns less than $20,000 per year and is entitled to…

Grange v. Grange

The provisions of Family Ct Act § 412 "require a delicate balancing of each party's needs and means "( Matter…