From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Harrison v. N.Y. City Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1992
188 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 10, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.).


The trial court properly concluded that respondent New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within the 90-day period for serving the notice of claim under General Municipal Law § 50-e (1) (a). The Housing Authority police report, filled out only two weeks after the alleged accident, indicates not only that NYCHA was given notice of the allegedly defective stairway, but that one of the Authority's police officers investigated the site. Moreover, NYCHA received the notice of claim only one month after the expiration of the 90-day period, which is a "reasonable time thereafter" within the meaning of General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), and respondent failed to demonstrate any significant prejudice to its ability to investigate the claim arising from this one-month delay.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Harrison v. N.Y. City Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1992
188 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Harrison v. N.Y. City Hous. Auth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DORICE HARRISON, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 37

Citing Cases

Stark v. W. Hempstead Union Free Sch. Dist.

Furthermore, respondent received petitioner's motion containing the notice of claim approximately 78 days…

Saxon v. Dep't of Educ. of the City of New York

wledge may be imputed to a municipality where its employees engaged in the conduct giving rise to a claim…