From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hall v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 13, 2000
274 A.D.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

July 13, 2000.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Karl A. Hall Jr. petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter G. Crary of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Graffeo, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting violent conduct, demonstrations and rioting. Initially, we note that the Attorney-General concedes, and our review of the record confirms, that there is insufficient evidence to support that part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of rioting, thereby requiring that this charge be annulled and expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Additionally, since the penalty imposed included a loss of good time, the matter must be remitted to respondent for a redetermination of the penalty imposed (see, Matter of Rowe v. Goord, 257 A.D.2d 935).

Turning to petitioner's remaining contentions, we find that the misbehavior report and testimony of the correction officer, who heard the potentially violent remark made by petitioner in the presence of hundreds of inmates, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt with respect to the remaining charges (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966). Any conflict in the witnesses' testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Nieves v. Selsky, 263 A.D.2d 795, 796). Finally, even if preserved for our review, we would find petitioner's contention of Hearing Officer bias to be without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of the charge of rioting; petition granted to that extent, respondent is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner's institutional record and matter remitted to respondent for redetermination of the penalty imposed on the remaining violations; and, as so modified, confirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Hall v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 13, 2000
274 A.D.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Hall v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF KARL A. HALL JR., Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, AS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 13, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 799

Citing Cases

Vanier v. Goord

Initially, the Attorney-General concedes, and based on our review of the record we agree, that there is…

Taylor v. Poole

Respondent concedes, and our review of the record confirms, that there is insufficient evidence to support…