From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Haecker

Supreme Court of Indiana
Mar 25, 1998
693 N.E.2d 529 (Ind. 1998)

Summary

finding attorney's clandestine act of voyeurism of the occupants of his rental property constituted a crime that reflected adversely on his fitness as an attorney in other respects

Summary of this case from Disciplinary Board v. Templeton

Opinion

No. 17S00-9608-DI-947.

March 25, 1998.


ORDER GRANTING REINSTATEMENT

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and recommends that the petitioner, John M. Haecker, be reinstated to the practice of law in this state. Since our Order issued January 9, 1998, we have been holding the Commission's recommendation under advisement pending evaluation of the respondent's past misconduct as it relates to his present fitness to practice law.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the recommendation of the Disciplinary Commission should be followed and that, accordingly, the petitioner should be reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement of petitioner John M. Haecker is hereby granted. Accordingly, the petitioner is reinstated as a member of the bar of this state.

All Justices concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Haecker

Supreme Court of Indiana
Mar 25, 1998
693 N.E.2d 529 (Ind. 1998)

finding attorney's clandestine act of voyeurism of the occupants of his rental property constituted a crime that reflected adversely on his fitness as an attorney in other respects

Summary of this case from Disciplinary Board v. Templeton
Case details for

Matter of Haecker

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOHN M. HAECKER

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Mar 25, 1998

Citations

693 N.E.2d 529 (Ind. 1998)

Citing Cases

Disciplinary Board v. Templeton

For these reasons, we find Templeton's criminal acts of invading Doe's, Roe's, and Poe's privacy reflects…