From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Haberstroh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 25, 1998
251 A.D.2d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 25, 1998

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


After 24 years of employment as a school secretary, claimant took advantage of the employer's early retirement program. In a March 25, 1996 decision, the Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) overruled the initial determination disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because she left her employment without good cause. Both the employer and the Commissioner of Labor appealed the decision; however, the Commissioner withdrew his appeal and on August 7, 1996 the Board dismissed the appeal. Thereafter, on December 23, 1996, the Board reopened the case, reviewed the record and reversed the ALJ's decision. Claimant contends that the Board abused its discretion by reopening the case 85 days after it had been dismissed. We disagree. Inasmuch as the Board has continuing jurisdiction and is not constrained by time limitations ( see, Matter of Huber [Sweeney], 228 A.D.2d 841), and as it erred in dismissing the appeal in the face of the employer's timely appeal, the only appropriate response was to reopen the case to preserve the employer's appellate rights.

White, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Haberstroh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 25, 1998
251 A.D.2d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Haberstroh

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of VIRGINIA HABERSTROH, Appellant. COMMISSIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 25, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
674 N.Y.S.2d 879

Citing Cases

Matter of Scott

We disagree. The record reveals that the employer failed to appear at the initial hearing because it was…

In re Comm. of Labor

The employer appeals. It is well settled that the Board has continuing jurisdiction to reopen a matter on its…