From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gross v. Siegman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 1996
226 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 29, 1996

Appeal from the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner Edward Gross is not the biological grandfather of the children with whom he seeks visitation rights and he is not a legal grandparent by virtue of adoption. Accordingly, he is not the children's grandparent within the meaning of Domestic Relations Law § 72 and has no right thereunder to seek visitation ( see, Matter of Hantman v. Heller, 213 A.D.2d 637; Matter of Alison D. v. Virginia M., 77 N.Y.2d 651, 656). Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Gross v. Siegman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 1996
226 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Gross v. Siegman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FLORENCE GROSS, Petitioner, and EDWARD GROSS, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 44

Citing Cases

Peters v. Costello

New York state courts interpret "grandparent" to mean the biological or adoptive parent of a parent. Gross…

Montes v. Sands

The stepgrandfather appeals. We agree with Family Court's determination to direct dismissal of the…