From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Greenseid v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 27, 1972
284 N.E.2d 152 (N.Y. 1972)

Opinion

Argued March 15, 1972

Decided April 27, 1972

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department.

Robert Roy Dann, Alfred J. Bohlinger and Victor M. Rosenzweig for Harry Greenseid and others, appellants-respondents.

Murray Gartner for Austin B. Cox, appellant-respondent.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Philip Weinberg and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), for respondent-appellant.


In each proceeding: Order modified by reinstating that part of the hearing officer's basic findings, conclusions and decision, relating to the proper calculation of the amount of the depletion, which were struck by the Appellate Division, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Taking the record as a whole, we find substantial competent evidence to support the entire determination made by the Superintendent and conclude that the trustees have failed to demonstrate that the administrative proceedings were tainted by any irregularities or a denial of procedural due process.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

Matter of Greenseid v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 27, 1972
284 N.E.2d 152 (N.Y. 1972)
Case details for

Matter of Greenseid v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HARRY GREENSEID et al., Individually and as Trustees of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 27, 1972

Citations

284 N.E.2d 152 (N.Y. 1972)
284 N.E.2d 152
333 N.Y.S.2d 166

Citing Cases

Matter of Greenseid v. Stewart

Decided June 8, 1972 Appeal from ( 30 N.Y.2d 730) MOTIONS TO AMEND…

Matter of Coluccio v. Schenck

Furthermore, there was substantial evidence to support respondent's finding that the total depletion of…