From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Greene v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 1993
196 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

September 23, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Clinton County.


Petitioner was found guilty after a Superintendent's hearing of violating certain prison disciplinary rules prohibiting violation of the Penal Law, solicitation of goods or services without consent and lying. Petitioner contends that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence and that he was given insufficient notice of the charges against him.

Initially, we find that the misbehavior report gave petitioner sufficient notice of the charges against him (see, Matter of Williams v Coughlin, 190 A.D.2d 883, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 651; Matter of Morales v Senkowski, 165 A.D.2d 393). We further find, however, that there was insufficient evidence to establish petitioner's guilt. The evidence against petitioner centered upon information from a confidential informant who stated that petitioner had been part of a conspiracy to file fraudulent State and Federal income tax returns to collect undeserved refunds. A review of the confidential transcript of the Hearing Officer's interview of the investigator who spoke with the informant reveals that the Hearing Officer failed to make an independent assessment of the informant's reliability. While the investigator stated that the informant's statements were supported by other information the investigator had received, this corroborating evidence was not before the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Nelson v Coughlin, 148 A.D.2d 779). Further, the informant's information was not sufficiently detailed to enable the Hearing Officer to independently assess it (see, supra). Because the only other evidence was not inculpatory, the determination is not supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Suvill v Coughlin, 160 A.D.2d 1160, revd on other grounds 77 N.Y.2d 642; Matter of Nelson v Coughlin, supra; Matter of Wynter v Jones, 135 A.D.2d 1032).

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Cardona, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted and respondent is directed to expunge all references to this matter from petitioner's records and restore him to prehearing status.


Summaries of

Matter of Greene v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 1993
196 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Greene v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TONY L. GREENE, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 23, 1993

Citations

196 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 232

Citing Cases

McCarthy v. Prack

Although a confidential informant related that petitioner acted as the lookout, the reliability of this…

Brown v. Selsky

Nevertheless, petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rule 103.10, "[i]nmates shall not…