From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Mahr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 20, 1996
230 A.D.2d 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

August 20, 1996


In a proceeding to validate a petition designating Desmond A. Green as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 10, 1996, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Judge of the Surrogate's Court for Kings County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated August 2, 1996, which, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the proceeding is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings.

A proceeding to contest the invalidation of a designating petition must be "instituted within fourteen days after the last day to file [a] petition, or within three business days after * * * a determination of invalidity" (Election Law § 16-102). A petitioner raising a challenge under Election Law § 16-102 must comply with CPLR 304 in order to "commence" the proceeding, and the petitioner must also complete service on all necessary parties within the period prescribed by Election Law § 16-102 (2) in order to "institute" the proceeding in a timely fashion (see, Matter of Zicari v Stewart, 207 A.D.2d 951, 952; Matter of Barbarite v Hill, 197 A.D.2d 740; Matter of Ehle v Wallace, 195 A.D.2d 1086). Since the petitioner filed his pleadings with the County Clerk and presented his order to show cause on the same day that his designating petition was determined to be invalid, this proceeding was commenced in a timely fashion, and the petitioner still had three days to serve all of the necessary parties in a manner reasonably calculated to give them notice within the time limits set by Election Law § 16-102 (2). The dismissals of the petitioner's prior proceedings were not on the merits and do not present an impediment to the timely institution of this proceeding. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings. Hart, J.P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Green v. Mahr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 20, 1996
230 A.D.2d 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Green v. Mahr

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DESMOND A. GREEN, Appellant, v. CORAMINITA MAHR et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 20, 1996

Citations

230 A.D.2d 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 385

Citing Cases

Rotanelli v. Westchester Cnty. Bd. of Elections

A proceeding to invalidate a designating petition pursuant to Election Law § 16–102 must be instituted…

Parietti v. Sampson

In an order dated March 7, 2013, the Supreme Court denied the appellants' motion to dismiss the…