From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gorton v. Max Brenders Farm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 1958
7 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

November 10, 1958

Present — Foster, P.J., Bergan, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.


Appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen's Compensation Board. Appellants do not attack the finding that in 1953 claimant, while employed as a domestic, sustained back injuries and an aggravation of a pre-existing back condition, as the results of a fall. Appellants do deny causal relation as respects the partial disability from March 15, 1956 for which an award has been made on the basis of reduced earnings. There was substantial evidence of disability related to the original accident, which the board was entitled to accept. It may be that another trier of the facts would have differently evaluated the medical evidence of causality or, as respected one physician's testimony, have found greater significance in certain statements made upon cross-examination, but the weight of the evidence was, of course, for the board and we cannot say, upon the entire record, that the evidence which it chose to accept was without substance. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Gorton v. Max Brenders Farm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 1958
7 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Matter of Gorton v. Max Brenders Farm

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of NELLIE GORTON, Respondent, against MAX…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1958

Citations

7 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Matter of Groff v. National Gypsum Co.

The issues of exposure and causality were factual ones. Another trier of the facts might have evaluated…