From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Golden v. Whittemore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 19, 1986
125 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

December 19, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oneida County, Roy, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Green, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In 1982 petitioner represented respondent in an action for divorce and was never paid $2,459 in attorney's fees. Pursuant to the settlement of that action, respondent continues to own an undivided one-half interest in the marital residence. In 1983, respondent's debts, including petitioner's attorney's fees, were discharged in bankruptcy. Petitioner now seeks to impress a lien against the marital residence pursuant to Judiciary Law § 475. Special Term properly dismissed the petition. Since respondent already owned the marital residence, no proceeds were created and thus no charging lien attaches to this realty. (Ekelman v Marano, 251 N.Y. 173, 176; Goldstein, Goldman, Kessler Underberg v. 4000 E. Riv. Rd. Assoc., 64 A.D.2d 484, 487, affd 48 N.Y.2d 890; Matter of Desmond v. Socha, 38 A.D.2d 22, 24, affd 31 N.Y.2d 687).


Summaries of

Matter of Golden v. Whittemore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 19, 1986
125 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of Golden v. Whittemore

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LAWRENCE W. GOLDEN, Appellant, v. BRIAN R. WHITTEMORE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1986

Citations

125 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

United Orient v. 450 W. Corp.

It is clear under the statute that in order to establish a lien there must be asserted a claim which can…

Tunick v. Shaw

The Court rejects these arguments. It is true that an attorney does not create a fund or proceeds where the…