From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gibson v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 21, 1988
142 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

July 21, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Clinton County.


Petitioner, an inmate at Clinton Correctional Facility in Clinton County, allegedly patted a civilian teacher employed at the facility on the buttocks as she passed him on a stairway. As a result of the incident, petitioner was charged with violating prison rules which prohibit inmates from physically interfering with employees and from harassing employees with obscene gestures. Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charge of harassing an employee by obscene gestures. The disposition was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This proceeding ensued.

Petitioner contends that the determination was not supported by substantial evidence. We cannot agree. At the hearing, the teacher testified that as she was descending the stairway from the second floor of the annex school an inmate patted her buttocks and made a remark which she could not clearly discern. She testified that she was unable to identify the inmate because she did not look at him as they passed in the stairway. However, as soon as she reached the bottom of the stairs, she reported the incident to Correction Officer Tyler Smith. Testifying at the hearing, Smith related that as soon as the teacher told him of the incident, he knew it was petitioner since he had observed petitioner ascending the stairs immediately prior to the complaint. Smith testified that he called Correction Officer Bruce Jarvis, who was at the top of the stairway, to ascertain whether any other inmates could have been in the stairway. Jarvis indicated that no other inmate, except petitioner, was in the stairway at the relevant time. Jarvis also testified at the hearing regarding his observations. This testimony clearly constitutes sufficient evidence to support the administrative determination (see, People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 139; Matter of Scarborough v. Coughlin, 137 A.D.2d 933).

Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and found meritless.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Mikoll, Levine, Harvey and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Gibson v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 21, 1988
142 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Gibson v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LEROY GIBSON, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 21, 1988

Citations

142 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

La Bounty v. Coughlin

The correction officer who discovered the questionable slips filed the misbehavior report upon which the…

Matter of Brown v. Coughlin

Additionally, the facility's Deputy Superintendent testified that petitioner's hand was discolored following…