From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibbons v. Zara Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 3, 1980
77 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

July 3, 1980


Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed June 27, 1979, which denied claimant's application for reconsideration. Claimant, at age 15, was working in a lavatory located in a building which functioned as a repair shop for the repair of machinery used by the employer in its road paving and sewer construction work. Claimant contended that he was employed in a factory in violation of subdivision 2 of section 131 Lab. of the Labor Law and that, therefore, he is entitled to double compensation pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 14-a of the Workers' Compensation Law. By decision, filed December 1, 1978, the board found that there was no violation of section 131 Lab. of the Labor Law and concluded that the employer was not liable for an award under section 14-a of the Workers' Compensation Law. Claimant applied to the board for reconsideration of this decision, maintaining that the board had failed to properly construe the pertinent statutes. Claimant's application was denied by the board. On December 13, 1979, this court granted respondent's motion to dismiss claimant's appeal from the board's decision filed December 1, 1978 on the ground that it was untimely taken. Consequently, the sole issue on this appeal is the propriety of the board's decision denying claimant's application for reconsideration. The board's denial of an application for reconsideration may not be disturbed unless it was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion (Matter of Oliva v. Albany Cycle Co., 72 A.D.2d 641; Matter of Eddings v Big Jim Serv. Center, 62 A.D.2d 1119). Claimant offered no additional facts or newly discovered evidence to the board on his application for reconsideration. In our view, the decision of the board was not an abuse of discretion nor arbitrary and capricious, and, therefore, it must be affirmed (Matter of Wasserman v. Charcoal Chef, 66 A.D.2d 981; Matter of Aiello v Rissel Constr. Corp., 37 A.D.2d 884, mot for lv to app den 30 N.Y.2d 484). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J.P., Sweeney, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gibbons v. Zara Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 3, 1980
77 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Gibbons v. Zara Construction Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JEFFREY GIBBONS, Appellant, v. ZARA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 3, 1980

Citations

77 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Matter of Thomas v. Motors

We also note that there is no denial by the Fund that the third-party action was pending at the time the…

Matter of Marino v. K.L.M. Royal Dutch

Moreover, consistent with the Board's jurisdiction and control over awards of compensation in the State (see,…