From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Getman v. Getman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 26, 1989
156 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

December 26, 1989

Appeal from the Family Court, Queens County (Gage, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof awarding the petitioner $4,150 in counsel fees and substituting therefor a provision awarding the petitioner $2,375 in counsel fees; as so modified the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the court in its discretion may award counsel fees (Family Ct Act § 438). Relevant factors in making such an award are both parties' ability to pay, the nature and extent of the services rendered and the reasonableness of their performance under the circumstances (see, Sampson v Glazer, 109 A.D.2d 831, 832). The resources of the party seeking an award of counsel fees is only one of several factors to be considered (see, Goldstein v Goldstein, 123 A.D.2d 739; Stern v Stern, 67 A.D.2d 253). At bar, the Family Court properly awarded counsel fees to the petitioner since the respondent has consistently sought to avoid his support obligation thereby necessitating enforcement proceedings. It would be unfair under these circumstances to require the petitioner to deplete her meager resources to pay her counsel fees (see, e.g., Brennen v Brennen, 148 A.D.2d 487; Cotton v Cotton, 147 A.D.2d 436; Schussler v Schussler, 109 A.D.2d 875).

Contrary to the petitioner's contention on appeal, we also find that the Family Court properly excluded from the award of counsel fees the amount attributable to legal services rendered in preparation of the support order sought to be enforced and in pursuing the appeal from that order. Nor may the petitioner recover for legal services rendered in an attempt to obtain an award of counsel fees. Counsel fees may be recovered only if a specific statutory provision or agreement provides therefor (see, Hempstead Gen. Hosp. v Allstate Ins. Co., 106 A.D.2d 429, affd 64 N.Y.2d 958). Neither an award of counsel fees for services rendered in procuring the original support order nor in obtaining an award of counsel fees is authorized by Family Court Act § 438. Accordingly, we delete that portion of the award which represented compensation for those services (see, Schussler v Schussler, supra). Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Getman v. Getman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 26, 1989
156 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Getman v. Getman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BEATRICE GETMAN, Appellant-Respondent, v. WILLIAM GETMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 26, 1989

Citations

156 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
549 N.Y.S.2d 161

Citing Cases

Saslow v. Saslow

ng the dissolution of this 18-year marriage, the Supreme Court providently awarded $800 per month in…

Jurs v. Jurs

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Taking into account the various factors…