From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gerzack v. Gerzack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 15, 1982
87 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

March 15, 1982


In a proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, Leo Gerzack appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.), dated February 3, 1981, which, after a hearing, (1) denied his application for a downward modification of court-ordered child support payments, (2) held that he had willfully failed to make those support payments, (3) fixed the arrears at $700, and (4) ordered his incarceration for a period of 30 days, in the event that he did not pay the arrears by April 1, 1981. On March 25, 1981, this court stayed that portion of the order appealed from which directed Mr. Gerzack's incarceration, pending determination of the instant appeal. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Appellant's time to pay the arrears is extended until 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. For the first time on appeal, appellant alleges a jurisdictional defect, to wit, that the summons did not contain the notice required by subdivision (b) of section 453 FCT of the Family Court Act (see Matter of Rappaport, 85 A.D.2d 697; Matter of Ellis v Ellis, 85 A.D.2d 602). However, this court is bound by the record, which does not bear out appellant's contention. The court's copy of the summons dated January 13, 1981 contains the requisite notice. If appellant wishes to raise a jurisdictional objection dehors the record, he has a remedy pursuant to CPLR 5015 (subd [a], par 4). Turning to the merits, we perceive no grounds to disturb the determination of the Family Court. Appellant's assertion that an injury to his wrist in early December, 1980 precluded him from pursuing his trade as a carpenter, was contradicted by petitioner and appellant's own testimony that his injury did not preclude him from going bowling once a week. Thus, the Family Court properly refused to credit his assertions. Appellant's remaining contentions are also without merit. Titone, J.P., Gibbons, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Gerzack v. Gerzack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 15, 1982
87 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Gerzack v. Gerzack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THERESA GERZACK, Respondent, v. LEO GERZACK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 15, 1982

Citations

87 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Sutton-Murley v. O'Connor

In support of this claim, he submitted medical records concerning psychiatric treatment that he received from…

Papa v. 24 Caryl Avenue Realty Co.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The evidence before the Supreme Court was…