From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gattiboni v. Aponte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 29, 1992
188 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 29, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin B. Stecher, J.).


As the complaint was instituted prior to April 1, 1984, the effective date of the revised statute (Administrative Code of City of N Y § 26-516 [g]), there was a rational basis for the agency to require production of a complete rental history to June 30, 1974 (Matter of Lavanant v State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, 148 A.D.2d 185). Further, as petitioner failed to prove the rent overcharge was not willful by a preponderance of the evidence, respondent properly imposed treble damages (Rent Stabilization Code [9 N.Y.CRR] § 2526.1 [a] [1]). Finally, as petitioner was provided with notices setting forth procedures and penalties, and an opportunity to be heard, there was no violation of due process.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Gattiboni v. Aponte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 29, 1992
188 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Gattiboni v. Aponte

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PIETRO GATTIBONI, Appellant, v. ANGELO APONTE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Ador Realty, LLC v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal

The dispute was ultimately resolved by the Court of Appeals ( see Matter of Century Tower Assoc. v. State of…

ZUMO MGT. v. DHCR

Thus, the statute presumes that an overcharge is willful and places the burden of establishing that it was…