From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gaston v. Herbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 18, 1999

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fahey, J. — CPLR art 78.

PRESENT: LAWTON, J. P., HAYES, WISNER, HURLBUTT AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner is serving concurrent indeterminate terms of incarceration of 20 years to life for his conviction in 1978 of murder in the second degree and 5 to 15 years for his conviction in 1977 for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. Because there was no basis for judicial intervention, Supreme Court properly denied the petition seeking to vacate the determination of the Parole Board that denied petitioner's application for parole release (see, Executive Law § 259-i Exec. [5]; Matter of Zapata v. Russi, 219 A.D.2d 849). The record establishes that the Parole Board considered the appropriate factors (see, Executive Law § 259-i Exec. [2] [c]; cf., Matter of King v. New York State Div. of Parole, 83 N.Y.2d 788, 791), and there is no "showing of irrationality bordering on impropriety" (Matter of Russo v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 N.Y.2d 69, 77; see, Matter of Zane v. Travis, 231 A.D.2d 848, 848-849).


Summaries of

Matter of Gaston v. Herbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Gaston v. Herbert

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF KENNETH L. GASTON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. VICTOR HERBERT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 819

Citing Cases

Matter of Thurman v. Hodges

Supreme Court erred in granting the petition. The record demonstrates that the Parole Board considered the…

Matter of Raqiyb v. Donnelly

The record demonstrates that the Parole Board considered the relevant statutory factors ( see Executive Law…