From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gaston v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1085 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.

Present — Boomer, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.


Determination unanimously annulled on the law and petition granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: On May 19, 1990, there was a food strike at the Auburn Correctional Facility. Based upon confidential information received from an inmate by a correction officer, petitioner was charged with organizing the food strike in violation of 7 NYCRR 270.2 (B) (5) (iii). After a Tier III rehearing, at which petitioner and two other inmates testified that petitioner had not been involved in the food strike, petitioner was found guilty.

The record of the Tier III rehearing shows that there was no evidence against petitioner except the conclusory statement of the informant, which was related by the correction officer who received the information. Although the informant was identified during in camera testimony, he did not testify, and there was no evidence corroborating his information. The record was insufficient to enable the Hearing Officer to assess the reliability of that information. Thus, the proof does not constitute substantial evidence and is insufficient to support the determination (see, Matter of Carter v Kelly, 159 A.D.2d 1006, 1008; Matter of Nelson v Coughlin, 148 A.D.2d 779, 780; Matter of Alvarado v LeFevre, 111 A.D.2d 475). All references to these charges must be expunged from petitioner's files.

We have examined petitioner's other contention and find it to be without merit.


Summaries of

Matter of Gaston v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1085 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Gaston v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KENNETH GASTON, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 1085 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
582 N.Y.S.2d 878

Citing Cases

Matter of Cotto v. Bautista

The record does not demonstrate the reliability or basis of knowledge of the informants, nor does it contain…

Matter of Boyd v. Coughlin

Memorandum: We conclude that respondents' determination is supported by substantial evidence. The transcripts…